homeSaving K-12 - - ReviewsAbout / News / Contact1: English and Education2: In Praise Of Stark Lucidity3: Latin Lives On + Greek Lives On4: An Inquiry Into Modifier Noun Proliferation5: Noun Overuse Phenomenon Article6: Let's Get Serious About Education7: A Smashing Victory8: A Metalinguistic Inquiry Into F9: Philosophy Weeps10: MAX Your Creativity11: What's All This Talk About Digital?12: "MAP" ALERT13: Precision Worth Preserving14: THEORYLAND15: "1984"--The Cover Up16: The Plight of Poetry17: Understanding Robots18: Tao Te Ching (followed by "Notes on the Spiritual Life")19: Form, Function, Foolishness20: The Quizz (or: Facts Are Fun!)21: A Tribute to Rudolf Flesch22: On Bullsh*t & Sophistry23: The Creativity Question24: Birds Like Us25: Phooey on John Dewey26: How To Teach History, Etc.27: Ivan Pavlov-- Education Goes To the Dogs28: Tips for Helping Your Child Do Better in School29: The Rules Of Poetry30: The War Against Reading31: Teacher Liberation Front32: Teaching Science--Science Is Fun33: How To Help A Non-Reader To Read34: The Con in Constructivism35: Most Eminent Authority In Reading-- Dr. Samuel Blumenfeld36: The Assault on Math37: Whole Word versus Phonics38: Saving Public Schools39: How To Teach Physics, Etc.40: Sight Words -- Dolch Words -- The Big Stupid41: Educators, O. J. Simpson, and Guilt42: Reading Resources43: American Basic Curriculum44: The Myth of Automaticity45: The Crusade Against Knowledge & Memory46: American Public Schools Designed To Fail47: Teach One Fact Each Day48: You Still Teach Sight Words??!!49: How Do We Learn & Teach50: Leading Boys to Reading51: Learning Styles: How Educators Divide Kids52: The Conspiracy Chronicles53: Education Establishment Hates Math54: Preemptive Reading55: Letters From Teachers / oldest first56: Top 10 Worst Ideas In Education57: Cooperative Learning58: How To Teach A Poem59: Critical Thinking--If Only60: Smart Content Makes Kids Smarter61: Early Literacy Pack--ELP62: Prior Knowledge--Strange New Religion63: PROJECT-BASED LEARNING64: Head Start -- how would it be done right??65: How They Wrecked The Schools,COMMENTS / newest firstNew American Curriculum--Five Point Reform PlanA Bill of Rights for Students 2020The Education EnigmaREADING THEORYINDEX/ SITE SEARCH /GOODIESEducator of the YearImprove Education BLOG"Saving K-12" -- Reviews









I believe the Princeton Alumni Weekly should, as one of its purposes, enable communication between alumni. I have twice had articles rejected that I specifically wrote for PAW and the other alumni. (One is now “9: Philosophy Weeps” on this site. The other is "Education's Intellectual Machinery Is Broken," now on American Thinker) These articles are serious, important work, and good writing. Some of my earlier pieces for PAW (e.g., "1: English and Education") got a lot of fan mail. I have to assume the rejections were based on political censorship. 


"By alumni for alumni..." Really?



So this note is a roundabout way of perhaps reaching a few alumni that I was prevented from reaching in PAW. If you’re interested in education reform and see some way we can be strategic allies, please get in touch.



Generally speaking, I’m sorry that Princeton seems to be going out of its way to be “liberal.” I’m not sure you can have a great university unless you remain slightly conservative--against the dictates of political fashion, in favor of longer historical perspectives. At the very least, I would like Princeton to remain resolutely in the center.



Real liberalism would demand that children be educated to each one’s maximum potential. That is my philosophy, and the goal of my work. Princeton and I should be on the exact same page. So it’s troubling when we are not. 






For example, when Arne Duncan came to Princeton to promote Common Core, it was not appropriate for the president of the University to cheer him on. CCSS was a new, untested, somewhat gimmicky concoction. Princeton gives up intellectual prestige by seeming too close.


As I reflect back on the Education Wars, I've become more convinced that the elite universities failed the country by not taking a stand against the worst excesses of our K-12 education commissars. I have begun to develop a general thesis that the intellectual have's should be more protective of the intellectual have-not's. Here is one expression of that thesis. "Princeton, Harvard, and Yale can help improve K-12 education."